|
|
Welcome
to the website of the Charnwood Forest Oil Action Group (CFOAG) This website has been created to provide information about, and to oppose, the proposal by Technology Investment & Exploration Ltd (TIEL) to explore for oil in the heart of Charnwood Forest in rural Leicestershire, UK, close to the picturesque villages of Quorn, Woodhouse, Swithland & Woodhouse Eaves.
What is the substance of the planning application? Where is the exact location of the proposed initial bore hole? How do they know that there is oil in this area? Does the geology of the area indicate the likely presence of oil? Why should this planning application be opposed? What can I do to object to this planning application? What is the attitude of the villages' Parish Councils? What is the attitude of Charnwood Borough Council? What are the campaign developments?
|
|||||
|
What is the substance of the planning application? The applicant, TIEL, has applied for planning permission (P/01/1646/2) to explore for oil by sinking an initial exploratory bore hole 3,200 metres deep in an area of approx 1.75 hectares at Vicary Farm in the land between Quorn and Woodhouse Eaves. This will involve laying a raised stone roadway for approx 1.5Km next to the Great Central Railway line from Woodhouse Road to the Vicary Farm site. To lay this road will require approx 8,300 tonnes of stone (415 lorry-loads), transported along the Woodhouse Road from the A6 bypass. This means there will be a 20 tonne lorry using this road every 20 minutes. Road laying will take an estimated 8 weeks & will occur from 7.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m., Monday to Friday and 9.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. on Saturdays. Once installed, the drilling rig will be 150 feet tall (equivalent to a 17-storey block of flats), will be floodlit and will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. There would be a multitude of traffic movements on Woodhouse road and on a raised stone road alongside the Great Central Railway line to support this operation. There would be increased air pollution from dust and from diesel fumes from the electricity generators. If no oil is found, TIEL undertakes to restore the land to its original appearance with the caveat... "weather permitting". This road-laying and exploratory drilling it scheduled to last approximately 20 weeks, although due to the limited availability of the drilling rig (apparently there are only two such rigs in the country), this time period is unlikely to be in a single span. Planning permission is being sought for an initial period of 2 years.
|
|||||
|
Where is the exact location of the proposed initial bore hole? The site of the initial proposed bore hole is at Vicary Farm approx 1.5Km from the Woodhouse Road and close to Swithland Reservoir. It would be accessed by a raised stone road which would be laid alongside the steam railway line of the Great Central Railway. Blue
asterisk (*)
on map indicates proposed access to site in amended application.
|
||||||
|
How do they know that there is oil in this area? The answer is that they don't for sure. But, TIEL claims to have used something called "microlepton" technology to prospect for this oil which involves using satellites & helicopters to detect microlepton radiation emitted from subsurface deposits of oil. (Indeed, TIEL was set up as a company explicitly to demonstrate this new technology). However, Alkor International Ltd, who declare they have a patent on Microlepton Geo-Vision Technology, strongly deny any association with TIEL and this application to drill in Charnwood Forest (see the denial on their website). It is claimed that this technique gives a more reliable indication of the presence of oil and other deposits than other, conventional, methods. However eminent physicists in the UK and elsewhere in the world say that there is no such thing as a microlepton and that the technology is bunk. For example, Prof Robin Marshall FRS, Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester told us... "I have trawled for information about "microleptons" and read what the proponents are saying. It is completely bogus and constitutes a scientific hoax or fraud. It has no substance in fact and there is not a shred of evidence for its existence, nor is there a need, within our understanding of the physical world in which we live, for it to exist. Therefore, any technology based on it is equally bogus. The claims that it has already been used with success, for example in North Korea, are therefore empty". John Dowell FRS, Poynting Professor of Physics at the University of Birmingham, said the process "would defy the laws of physics". In a letter to CFOAG, Prof Dowell said: "I can give you my full assurance as an active particle physicist that you can be confident in rejecting any evidence for oil deposits based on the reported use of this technology." The whole concept of "microleptons" has also been discredited in Russia. See for example http://www.csicop.org/si/9607/russia.html How, then, can the authorities (at both local and central government level) take this application seriously? Judge for
yourself whether you think it is a crackpot
concept. See for example: We find it unbelievable and unacceptable that the authorities are willing to let a foreign company tear up an area of particularly attractive countryside in Leicestershire on the basis of this "science". See
what the scientific journals have to say:
|
||||||
|
Does the geology of the area indicate the likely presence of oil? Frankly, No! We asked the British Geological Survey (a Government Agency) to look at TIEL's application. The BGS told us: "It appears that the TIEL interpretation has not taken into account either the local surface geology or the limited seismic refraction work that had been carried out at this location some 20-30 years ago, and which is published in the accounts of Whitcombe and Maguire (1981) and Davies and Matthews (1966). If this work had been looked at , it would have allowed TIEL to conclude that the geology here is simple, consisting of probably 60-100m of Triassic strata that directly overlie Charnian or Mountsorrel-type ‘basement’ crystalline rocks, with no carboniferous strata being present.’ Why then, should TIEL's application be taken seriously?
|
||||||
|
Do we need this oil? We believe the answer is "No". TIEL says there is a 1 in 10 chance of finding oil and that the yield is likely to be meagre. A similar site at Rempstone, 9 Km away, produces only 50 barrels of oil a day from the same Namurian sandstones. Yet the North Sea has known reserves of 5 billion barrels, of which 2.2 million barrels are extracted daily.* One third of this is exported! Thus, we do not see why this development is even being contemplated in Charnwood Forest. *source: www.eia.doe.gov
|
|||||
|
Why should this planning application be opposed? CFOAG believes there are many reasons to oppose this application:
|
|||||
|
What can I do to object to this planning application? Since planning approval has now been granted by Leicestershire County Council, writing to them will be of little use. However, you
can offer us support by writing to the local MPs for the area, namely House of
Commons,
|
||||||
|
What is CFOAG? The Charnwood Forest Oil Action Group (CFOAG) consists of a group of residents of the villages bordering the proposed bore hole site (see our logo). Its aim is to oppose the plan by TIEL to drill for oil in the vicinity of villagers' homes and despoil this designated area of particularly attractive countryside (APAC) in the beautiful Charnwood Forest in Leicestershire. So far the Group has:
|
|||||
|
How can I support CFOAG? You can support the Charnwood Forest Oil Action Group by:
|
||||||
|
What is the attitude of the villages' Parish Councils? The Parish
Councils have voted to oppose this planning application.
|
||||||
|
What is the attitude of Charnwood Borough Council? The Charnwood Borough Council Plans Committee 2 considered this planning application on 16th August 2001 and agreed to "raise no objection", subject to 6 conditions. Subsequently, 5 councillors objected and so, under Council rules, the decision was referred to Charnwood Borough’s Regulatory Committee. This committee met on 3rd September 2001 and a motion to oppose the application was narrowly defeated 5-4 with 2/3 abstentions. It was then proposed that this committee should endorse the "raise no objection" decision of the Plans Committee 2, subject to a further 3 conditions. This proposal was carried, 7-2. However, 5 councillors again subsequently objected so the proposal was discussed at a full Council meeting on 17th September 2001. At this meeting, the Council voted to uphold the decision of the Regulatory Committee and to raise no objection to the planning application. CFOAG believes that in so doing, the Council has singularly failed to protect the interests of the residents whom it represents and is at variance with its own Sustainability Strategy. We have extracted relevant key points from this document.
|
||||||
|
What are the campaign developments? February 2002:
March 2002:
May 2002:
June 2002
November 2002
|
||||||
|
Useful Links ...ABOUT OUR LOCAL AREA: Quorn
village website
...ABOUT THE OIL& "microleptons": Energy
reserves in the UK from the US government DOE website |
||||||
|
This site
is maintained by CFOAG |